Re: mono updates in Cooker - fail to install

On Apr 28, 2011, at 11:21 AM, nicolas vigier wrote:

> On Thu, 28 Apr 2011, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> 
>> 
>> There are most definitely sound engineering reasons
>> for using DB->associate in "RPM ACID" which entails enforcing
>> a uniqueness constraint on database keys. But this mailing
>> list isn't the place to discuss "RPM ACID" engineering.
> 
> Interesting. What is the URL of rpm5 mailing list ?
> 

There isn't a URL for the rpm5 mailing list any more.
You can likely find discussion on secondary reflector's
using Google.

Meanwhile "RPM ACID" was implemented November, 2009 and
was started based on a RFE from the SuSE "RPM Summit"
on September 18th, 2009 as well as from research related
to Mancoosi WP3.

You're more than a bit late (after beta2) to participate
in any discussion of "RPM ACID" that is already implemented
and in "production". Not that Berkeley DB internals are very
interesting whatsoever.

73 de Jeff