|
|
Subscribe / Log in / New account

project naming

project naming

Posted Apr 7, 2011 11:54 UTC (Thu) by pjm (guest, #2080)
Parent article: TXLF: HeliOS helps schoolkids and challenges developers

Any "cognitive pathway" that exists for people speaking one language will not work for the majority of people, who speak some other language.

If you dislike the name Choqok, then you can see the futility in trying to provide a cognitive pathway. (‘Choqok’ provides as good a cognitive pathway for a Twitter client as any, to people who know it as a word meaning “sparrow”.)

It's hard to be sure that a given proposed project name doesn't exist as slang with negative connotations somewhere or other: for example, the relatively large English dictionary on my shelf doesn't mention the US slang sense of the word ‘gimp’ that the speaker was referring to (which I gather means something like ‘limp’), and most of the meanings it does give are somewhat decorative (and positive) in nature, so appropriate to a graphics program. Trying to choose a name that provides a good cognitive pathway in one language seems more likely to fall afoul of this problem than choosing a name like Kazehakase.

Perhaps the lesson to take from the HeliOS experience, then, is not so much about project naming as having interfaces give more prominence to descriptions and icons and less prominence to project names.


to post comments

project naming

Posted Apr 7, 2011 16:15 UTC (Thu) by martinfick (subscriber, #4455) [Link]

> If you dislike the name Choqok, then you can see the futility in trying to provide a cognitive pathway. ('Choqok' provides as good a cognitive pathway for a Twitter client as any, to people who know it as a word meaning "sparrow".)

Not to mention that the average non computer literate person doesn't know what twitter is anyway (I have to say, I am not even sure I know what twitter is). Name confusion is not a free software problem, it comes with any complex domain and it is not likely going away. Are the problems real? Yes. Is there really a way around it? I doubt it.

With complexity, if you are going to communicate, you need large vocabularies, and thus complexity. The vocabulary is there to help those in the know, not to make things complicated for those who don't. It is complicated for them, with or without the vocabulary. Blaming the vocabulary seems like a miss placed complaint, pointing at a symptom, not the cause of the complexity.


Copyright © 2025, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds