GNOME Shell 2.91.90 released
GNOME Shell 2.91.90 released
Posted Feb 23, 2011 20:25 UTC (Wed) by arjan (subscriber, #36785)Parent article: GNOME Shell 2.91.90 released
As one of the few developers that try to use MeeGo on a daily basis, I can say that it is absolutely horrible and the worst decision made in the MeeGo UI design.
I sure hope GNOME isn't going down the same rathole, and that the GNOME UI team considers "open source contributor" as one of their primary target users (in addition to the traditional "grandma" kind of user)...
open source projects thrive by (potential) contributors using their software and wanting to improve some aspects of it.. either as a one of contribution or by then getting roped into making the whole thing better in other areas too....
Posted Feb 23, 2011 20:34 UTC (Wed)
by halla (subscriber, #14185)
[Link] (1 responses)
Posted Feb 23, 2011 21:42 UTC (Wed)
by nedrichards (subscriber, #23295)
[Link]
And yes, I know that the touchpad on the S10-3t actively doesn't work (as opposed to just not work very well) but it's indicative, in our measurement and experience the target areas that a user can hit with a typical netbook touchpad are roughly equivalent to those you can hit with your finger.
Posted Feb 23, 2011 21:19 UTC (Wed)
by walters (subscriber, #7396)
[Link] (1 responses)
As far as appealing to contributors - definitely. Can you elaborate on "absolutely horrible"?
Posted Feb 23, 2011 21:51 UTC (Wed)
by nedrichards (subscriber, #23295)
[Link]
There were a number of reasons for that relating to consistency, design direction and implementation details of the window switcher. Reasons very much like the GNOME shell team in fact.
I wish we'd been able to explore some tiled window strategies as well, to try and meet the 'side by side' usage scenarios that we know exist and that Owen mentions but sadly, we never really prioritised it high enough as the side by side experience was just fundamentally unsatisfactory on 1024x600 at <10".
Posted Feb 23, 2011 21:33 UTC (Wed)
by alexl (subscriber, #19068)
[Link] (2 responses)
Posted Feb 23, 2011 21:38 UTC (Wed)
by xav (guest, #18536)
[Link] (1 responses)
Posted Feb 23, 2011 21:59 UTC (Wed)
by AlexHudson (guest, #41828)
[Link]
It makes much more sense not to have a minimization button in that scenario, but then you have to make sure you're not taking workflow away from the user. If you are, then maybe you think about some other system.
Having a window bar at the bottom just to support minimization is a bit of a waste of screen real estate.
Posted Feb 24, 2011 6:41 UTC (Thu)
by eduperez (guest, #11232)
[Link]
GNOME Shell 2.91.90 released
GNOME Shell 2.91.90 released
GNOME Shell 2.91.90 released
GNOME Shell 2.91.90 released
GNOME Shell 2.91.90 released
GNOME Shell 2.91.90 released
GNOME Shell 2.91.90 released
GNOME Shell 2.91.90 released