|
|
Subscribe / Log in / New account

An anthropologist's view of an open source community (Opensource.com)

An anthropologist's view of an open source community (Opensource.com)

Posted Feb 6, 2011 21:49 UTC (Sun) by njs (subscriber, #40338)
In reply to: An anthropologist's view of an open source community (Opensource.com) by jmm82
Parent article: An anthropologist's view of an open source community (Opensource.com)

The word 'exotic' implies that the interesting thing about some group of people is the ways in which their culture is different or similar to ones own, and in particular the ways in which those differences and similarities allow one to feel titillated, smug, vindicated, etc. That might be a useful concept for imperialists, but it doesn't help anyone do good science. It's been a long time since anthropology has been driven by a fascination with the "exotic".

These days you'll find anthropologists studying pretty much any cultural group you can think of, from small bands of indigenous hunter-gatherers to american skateboarders to giant-city street vendors to wall street firms. Which is as it should be.


to post comments

An anthropologist's view of an open source community (Opensource.com)

Posted Feb 7, 2011 21:25 UTC (Mon) by jmm82 (guest, #59425) [Link] (2 responses)

"The word 'exotic' implies that the interesting thing about some group of people is the ways in which their culture is different or similar to ones own, and in particular the ways in which those differences and similarities allow one to feel titillated, smug, vindicated, etc. That might be a useful concept for imperialists, but it doesn't help anyone do good science. "

Or maybe they just wanted to study a culture without influence from Western Civilization because it is unique. Yet, at least it gave you an excuse to use the words "titillated, smug, vindicated" in a post.

An anthropologist's view of an open source community (Opensource.com)

Posted Feb 7, 2011 22:03 UTC (Mon) by njs (subscriber, #40338) [Link] (1 responses)

> Yet, at least it gave you an excuse to use the words "titillated, smug, vindicated" in a post.

I'm not sure what you're hoping to accomplish by attacking my motives. It's certainly not going to change the history or current state of the field of anthropology. But I am sorry if my comment somehow read as a personal attack.

An anthropologist's view of an open source community (Opensource.com)

Posted Feb 8, 2011 6:21 UTC (Tue) by jmm82 (guest, #59425) [Link]

I guess I do not have a strong enough opinion on the subject to continue. I definetly do not want to change the history or current state of the field of anthropology. The only thing personal was we disagree.


Copyright © 2025, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds