XFS still gets dorked with?
XFS still gets dorked with?
Posted Jan 25, 2011 9:48 UTC (Tue) by dgm (subscriber, #49227)In reply to: XFS still gets dorked with? by dgc
Parent article: Kernel prepatch 2.6.38-rc2
Less lines were added to XFS than they were removed. That may mean code that's being heavily revisited, possible because it has languished somehow and is now being cleaned up?
Btrfs, on the other hand, adds far more lines that it removes, suggesting that its being developed and adding features at a fast pace. The difference in added lines between XFS and Btrfs is roughly 10%, not that much.
Finally, ext4 looks much more quiet. Adding features and fixing stuff here and there.
It would be nice to know the different sizes of each code base, but I assume they are comparable.
Posted Jan 25, 2011 12:09 UTC (Tue)
by cesarb (subscriber, #6266)
[Link]
$ sloccount fs/xfs
Totals grouped by language (dominant language first):
$ sloccount fs/btrfs
Totals grouped by language (dominant language first):
$ sloccount fs/ext4 fs/jbd2
Totals grouped by language (dominant language first):
Posted Jan 25, 2011 15:49 UTC (Tue)
by bronson (subscriber, #4806)
[Link]
Or it may indicate code that is so good and forward thinking that it was hoisted into the VFS layer. Dunno! It's a bad idea to read too much into statistics alone.
XFS still gets dorked with?
[...]
SLOC Directory SLOC-by-Language (Sorted)
47802 top_dir ansic=47802
11840 linux-2.6 ansic=11840
4628 quota ansic=4628
145 support ansic=145
ansic: 64415 (100.00%)
[...]
[...]
SLOC Directory SLOC-by-Language (Sorted)
46176 btrfs ansic=46148,sh=28
ansic: 46148 (99.94%)
sh: 28 (0.06%)
[...]
[...]
SLOC Directory SLOC-by-Language (Sorted)
24465 ext4 ansic=24465
4597 jbd2 ansic=4597
ansic: 29062 (100.00%)
[...]
XFS still gets dorked with?