Attachmate Acquisition: What does it mean for SUSE, openSUSE & open source?
Attachmate Acquisition: What does it mean for SUSE, openSUSE & open source?
Posted Dec 21, 2010 6:43 UTC (Tue) by niner (subscriber, #26151)In reply to: Attachmate Acquisition: What does it mean for SUSE, openSUSE & open source? by arjan
Parent article: Attachmate Acquisition: What does it mean for SUSE, openSUSE & open source?
I can remember the uproar when SuSE was bought by Novell and the end of the world scenarios. In the final analysis I'd say that quite to the contrary it was a very good thing to happen. I can't remember any incident where Novell really hurt the community (even the infamous Microsoft deal has not had any consequences yet and it's been years). Instead they founded the openSUSE project, put Yast under GPL and built tools like the openSUSE build service, that even helps other distributions.
Could very well be that Attachmate will just continue in that direction and that a standalone SUSE business unit can be more free in a technical sense as well. Integrating and developing Novell's middleware did for sure take a lot of resources.
Posted Dec 21, 2010 8:26 UTC (Tue)
by intgr (subscriber, #39733)
[Link] (3 responses)
I can name four consequences: Mono, Moonlight, Banshee and F-Spot. The Novell-Microsoft deal is the sole reason why a Microsoft-owned platform is invading our Linux desktops.
Posted Dec 21, 2010 8:34 UTC (Tue)
by rahulsundaram (subscriber, #21946)
[Link] (2 responses)
Posted Dec 21, 2010 8:39 UTC (Tue)
by niner (subscriber, #26151)
[Link] (1 responses)
Posted Dec 21, 2010 19:37 UTC (Tue)
by spaetz (guest, #32870)
[Link]
Attachmate Acquisition: What does it mean for SUSE, openSUSE & open source?
Attachmate Acquisition: What does it mean for SUSE, openSUSE & open source?
Attachmate Acquisition: What does it mean for SUSE, openSUSE & open source?
Attachmate Acquisition: What does it mean for SUSE, openSUSE & open source?
