Microsoft sues Motorola, citing Android patent infringement (ars technica)
Microsoft sues Motorola, citing Android patent infringement (ars technica)
Posted Oct 1, 2010 23:58 UTC (Fri) by jd (guest, #26381)Parent article: Microsoft sues Motorola, citing Android patent infringement (ars technica)
The reason I'd prefer that is that whilst I dispute the validity of software patents, the courts are wary of getting into that territory. On the other hand, we already have a well-defined (albeit narrow) ruling that the courts can go along with without feeling guilty over it.
The more that industry is forced to concede purely within the scope of that ruling, the less likely industry is to go down the path of patenting code. Being beaten in the courts threatens too much.
Sure, they may well decide to lobby Congress to develop a new form of IP to go along with trademarks, copyright and patents, but even that would force them to admit that it is not an invention in the accepted sense of the word.
Posted Oct 3, 2010 18:49 UTC (Sun)
by FlorianMueller (guest, #32048)
[Link] (1 responses)
There are various tactical options for the plaintiffs. I have just published two blog postings with further information for those interested in how quickly this might be resolved and to what degree this could escalate. I have also put together a categorized overview of all the patents asserted by Apple, Oracle and Microsoft against Android. Android caught in a crossfire of patents (possible escalation, categorized overview of patents) The US International Trade Commission as a patent enforcement agency (import of Motorola Droid could be banned within 18 months)
Posted Oct 4, 2010 7:28 UTC (Mon)
by tuxmania (guest, #70024)
[Link]
I dont really understand why you run around playing Microsofts tune to the note.
Microsoft sues Motorola, citing Android patent infringement (ars technica)
Microsoft sues Motorola, citing Android patent infringement (ars technica)