|
|
Subscribe / Log in / New account

No, put the warning in the tool output

No, put the warning in the tool output

Posted Sep 30, 2010 14:21 UTC (Thu) by dwheeler (guest, #1216)
Parent article: Quotes of the week

No. It'd be better to put that brief warning in the output of the tool itself. That way, *anyone* who uses the tool is presented with that information. Of course, they may ignore it anyway, but I think that would reduce the perceived flood.


to post comments

No, put the warning in the tool output

Posted Sep 30, 2010 18:27 UTC (Thu) by iabervon (subscriber, #722) [Link]

The thing I'd like is if checkpatch (in patch mode) gave an error if a hunk doesn't actually do anything. In addition to warning people who just try to fix (file mode) checkpatch warnings, it would note the situation where someone cleans up the style around a spot where they're putting a temporary debug check and ends up with just the style cleanup.


Copyright © 2025, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds