LinuxCon: A tale of two bootcharts
LinuxCon: A tale of two bootcharts
Posted Aug 26, 2010 14:30 UTC (Thu) by Fowl (subscriber, #65667)In reply to: LinuxCon: A tale of two bootcharts by rsidd
Parent article: LinuxCon: A tale of two bootcharts
<OT>
I've always found hibernate on Windows to be significantly faster than a fresh boot. Perhaps I'm stuck with hardware that is too low end though - 1GB of IO is faster than 4GB of IO shock horror!
I've always found hibernate on Windows to be significantly faster than a fresh boot. Perhaps I'm stuck with hardware that is too low end though - 1GB of IO is faster than 4GB of IO shock horror!
Sleep (and "Hybrid Sleep", aka suspend to ram + hibernate) _are_ marvellous, barring any firmware SNAFU's.
</OT>
re: old is new
A good idea is a good idea. ;)