SELF: Anatomy of an (alleged) failure
SELF: Anatomy of an (alleged) failure
Posted Jun 28, 2010 8:53 UTC (Mon) by Tet (guest, #5433)In reply to: SELF: Anatomy of an (alleged) failure by nix
Parent article: SELF: Anatomy of an (alleged) failure
Oh agreed, and in this particular case, it's not necessary. However, there are other situations where full fat binaries might be a win. I just get extremely annoyed by people claiming that the whole concept of multi-arch binaries is useless just because they happen to not have a valid use for them, and are unable to see that others might have.
Posted Jun 28, 2010 13:22 UTC (Mon)
by nix (subscriber, #2304)
[Link]
SELF: Anatomy of an (alleged) failure
The attitude appears to be 'distributors don't need them therefore they are useless'. This seems, to me, more than a little shortsighted...