|
|
Subscribe / Log in / New account

SELF: Anatomy of an (alleged) failure

SELF: Anatomy of an (alleged) failure

Posted Jun 24, 2010 18:43 UTC (Thu) by Spudd86 (subscriber, #51683)
In reply to: SELF: Anatomy of an (alleged) failure by cortana
Parent article: SELF: Anatomy of an (alleged) failure

FatELF won't have any effect on the flash situation at all, it has nothing to do with shipping one or two binaries, Adobe just doesn't care enough about 64-bit Linux to ship flash for it, that's it, FatELF won't change that, and it won't magically make 32<->64 dynamic linking work either, they are different ABI's and you'd still need a shim layer


to post comments


Copyright © 2025, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds