digiKam
digiKam
Posted Jun 20, 2010 10:48 UTC (Sun) by jospoortvliet (guest, #33164)In reply to: digiKam by Velmont
Parent article: A quick grumpy review of Shotwell
Posted Jun 23, 2010 5:20 UTC (Wed)
by Velmont (guest, #46433)
[Link] (6 responses)
Posted Jun 23, 2010 6:27 UTC (Wed)
by jospoortvliet (guest, #33164)
[Link] (2 responses)
Posted Jun 23, 2010 13:19 UTC (Wed)
by nix (subscriber, #2304)
[Link] (1 responses)
Posted Jun 23, 2010 13:26 UTC (Wed)
by jospoortvliet (guest, #33164)
[Link]
Posted Jun 24, 2010 11:49 UTC (Thu)
by emmi3 (subscriber, #62443)
[Link] (2 responses)
Since Ubuntu by default installs recommended packages (but afaik not suggested packages) konqueror is "pulled in".
So to install digikam with the kipi-plugins (and exiv2), but without Konqueror and Dolphin one could use the following command:
aptitude -R install digikam kipi-plugins+M exiv2+M
To find out about the dependencies I find the "-D"-switch for aptitude usually very helpful. Or use
aptitude -R digikam
and look out for RECOMMENDED but not installed packages
Yours,
Posted Jul 4, 2010 21:19 UTC (Sun)
by bjartur (guest, #67801)
[Link] (1 responses)
Posted Jul 5, 2010 8:30 UTC (Mon)
by Felix.Braun (guest, #3032)
[Link]
The difference as per Debian Packaging Policy is a matter of degree:
I think that this fine-grained dependency tracking allows Debian (and derivatives) to strike a good compromise between simplicity and configurability in terms of dependency management.
digiKam
digiKam
digiKam
digiKam
digiKam in Ubuntu RECOMMENDS konqueror
Robert
digiKam in Ubuntu RECOMMENDS konqueror
Debian Packaging Policy [OT]