Linux Users Standing Fast Despite SCO Legal Threats, InternetWeek Readers Say (TechWeb)
Fully 91 percent of people responding to an InternetWeek Reader Question said they will not change their Linux deployment plans as a result of SCO's actions."
Posted Jul 9, 2003 17:05 UTC (Wed)
by freethinker (guest, #4397)
[Link]
Posted Jul 9, 2003 21:51 UTC (Wed)
by hamjudo (guest, #363)
[Link] (2 responses)
Posted Jul 10, 2003 3:20 UTC (Thu)
by einstein (guest, #2052)
[Link]
Posted Jul 10, 2003 10:09 UTC (Thu)
by djabsolut (guest, #12799)
[Link]
May want to have a look at this:
Towards stopping the SCO torture
Posted Jul 9, 2003 23:16 UTC (Wed)
by jre (guest, #2807)
[Link] (1 responses)
Posted Jul 10, 2003 2:07 UTC (Thu)
by petegn (guest, #847)
[Link]
Do Not Taunt Happy Fun Penguin.
SCO shoots self in foot
Two things
Linux Users Standing Fast Despite SCO Legal Threats, InternetWeek Readers
Say (TechWeb)
SCO's legal threats are a significant problem, even though many IT managers
are ignoring them.
Actually the 9% includes even those who were considering reducing their linux projects in response to the sco FUD... There's a lot of difference between considering (which is never a bad idea) and doing. Linux Users Standing Fast Despite SCO Legal Threats, InternetWeek Readers
Say (TechWeb)
Of course, those who have a clue about linux need to consider for only a moment or so before they realize that sco is, in the words of one wise man, "full of it".
Linux Users Standing Fast Despite SCO Legal Threats, InternetWeek Readers
Say (TechWeb)
(Bruce Peren's response follows the main piece)
I find it appropriate that one commentator suggested
"Maybe if SCO were to join the Business Software Alliance they would gain access to resources sufficient to perpetually pursue their absurd claims."
Perhaps, if SCO comes to feel they are not learning the business of extortion quickly enough on the self-taught plan, they will indeed go to the pros.
"Nice company you got there. It'd be a <i>real shame </i> if something was to happen to it ..."
Hum i fought scox and the BSA were the same "bunch `O' cowboys " mus be "Nice company you got there. It'd be a <i>real shame </i> if something was to happen to it ..."
mistaken.. nere mind can be wrong now an then ..:-)))) ..
pete..
thats all folks