OpenOffice.org's Community Council responds to the FSF
OpenOffice.org's Community Council responds to the FSF
Posted May 10, 2010 21:53 UTC (Mon) by Trelane (subscriber, #56877)In reply to: OpenOffice.org's Community Council responds to the FSF by Trelane
Parent article: OpenOffice.org's Community Council responds to the FSF
In addition, if there were a car in which I could deal with the firmware myself (or get a mechanic to deal with) I'd buy it over the competition (provided, of course, it actually does the job of being a car). Freedom is a (super) feature, really.
I can't (yet) get user-serviceable (or computer-mechanic serviceable) firmware for 100% of my computers yet either. That doesn't imply that I don't want it.
Posted May 11, 2010 6:28 UTC (Tue)
by gdt (subscriber, #6284)
[Link] (1 responses)
(or you can buy them, if you have the cash). Actually, no. There's a nice lurk where they sell only to those with certification from manufacturer-run training courses. That way there's a limited supply of equipment (and so higher charges) and the manufacturer gets training revenue too. There's quite a desire for third-party diagnosis equipment, mainly from independent mechanics not wishing to purchase equipment for each manufacturers' vehicles they service. Of course the manufacturers are very opposed to this equipment and are using trade secrets, patents and DRM in response. The situation is widely seen as a fine illustration of market failure assisted by "intellectual property".
Posted May 11, 2010 12:02 UTC (Tue)
by Trelane (subscriber, #56877)
[Link]
Hooray for DRM and proprietary software!
OpenOffice.org's Community Council responds to the FSF
OpenOffice.org's Community Council responds to the FSF