Editorial deletions
Editorial deletions
Posted Apr 10, 2010 18:08 UTC (Sat) by PO8 (guest, #41661)In reply to: Editorial deletions by corbet
Parent article: Ubuntu switches search back to Google
Honestly, if I had posted either of the examples under discussion, I would both expect and hope that they would be deleted. You would be doing me a favor by helping to protect my reputation, and yourself a favor by helping to protect the reputation of LWN.
IMHO (having been involved with open source since before the beginning, and in my capacity as a college CS professor who deals with open source newbies on a regular basis) the "Wild West" nature of open source conversations is not helping us. I think it is a big part of what drives away women, people of under-represented ethnicities, older adults, and frankly a lot of really deep thinkers with a lot to contribute to our work. I would like to think of LWN as, among other things, a haven for those people. The comments should be an accompaniment to the measured and thoughtful LWN articles; failing that, they should at least not be an embarrassment and a source of discomfort and dismay.
Posted Apr 11, 2010 22:52 UTC (Sun)
by fyodor (guest, #3481)
[Link]
That being said, I'd welcome a community moderation system which hides downvoted posts, while allowing people to view them if desired. This can help highlight exceptional posts too. I'm not holding them up as shining examples, but Slashdot, Digg, and Youtube all have systems like this. I'd downvote this whole thread (including the original sexist joke), and certainly the healthcare rant PO8 mentioned too.
Editorial deletions