Ubuntu changing its look
Ubuntu changing its look
Posted Mar 3, 2010 21:54 UTC (Wed) by kh (guest, #19413)Parent article: Ubuntu changing its look
Posted Mar 3, 2010 22:00 UTC (Wed)
by jonas.bonn (subscriber, #47561)
[Link] (1 responses)
Posted Mar 3, 2010 22:20 UTC (Wed)
by man_ls (guest, #15091)
[Link]
Posted Mar 3, 2010 22:26 UTC (Wed)
by DOT (subscriber, #58786)
[Link] (1 responses)
Posted Mar 3, 2010 22:49 UTC (Wed)
by jengelh (guest, #33263)
[Link]
When they initially started with brown, people associated it with dirt, mud and uh some "completey different" things that need not be elaborated upon here. No doubt they want to get away from these associations. Orange would have worked, but their theme ended up being brown, not orange. (Amateur designer's hint: don't have any pixel with a lightness below 128/255 for Orange.)
Now, the first association I had with purple was http://cinie.files.wordpress.com/2009/09/pimp.jpg . In a way, that seems to just _completely fit_ Ubuntu.
Posted Mar 4, 2010 11:04 UTC (Thu)
by epa (subscriber, #39769)
[Link]
Posted Mar 4, 2010 13:07 UTC (Thu)
by maro (guest, #34315)
[Link]
I think it's good they use different colors. You can recognize a
Red: Red Hat
Ubuntu changing its look
Argh, that horrible aubergine (eggplant) color pops up again!
Not exactly purple
Ubuntu changing its look
Ubuntu changing its look
Colour choice
Ubuntu changing its look
distribution on thumbnailed screenshots like this:
Green: SuSE
Blue: Fedora
Ripped off Mac OS X interface with l33t fonts collected all over the
internet: Ubuntu
