GNOME accessibility developers concered about Oracle's commitment
GNOME accessibility developers concered about Oracle's commitment
Posted Feb 8, 2010 20:29 UTC (Mon) by rahvin (guest, #16953)In reply to: GNOME accessibility developers concered about Oracle's commitment by rodgerd
Parent article: GNOME accessibility developers concerned about Oracle's commitment
Posted Feb 8, 2010 20:56 UTC (Mon)
by Hanno (guest, #41730)
[Link]
Posted Feb 8, 2010 21:27 UTC (Mon)
by dgm (subscriber, #49227)
[Link] (3 responses)
Posted Feb 9, 2010 20:40 UTC (Tue)
by donbarry (guest, #10485)
[Link] (2 responses)
Posted Feb 9, 2010 22:08 UTC (Tue)
by dlang (guest, #313)
[Link] (1 responses)
if you want to force people to include your name (or your project's name) when they talk about their product you need to use the original BSD license.
There is a reason why almost nobody uses that anymore, and none of the commonly used license require attribution in derivitives.
Posted Feb 10, 2010 7:39 UTC (Wed)
by jamesh (guest, #1159)
[Link]
GNOME accessibility developers concered about Oracle's commitment
GNOME accessibility developers concered about Oracle's commitment
GNOME accessibility developers concered about Oracle's commitment
especially when most Ubuntu users hardly know the source that
Ubuntu uses as its bountiful upstream. Debian is still invisible
on the Ubuntu home page and it's not even obvious which of the first
tier links may mention it. That's unconscionable.
GNOME accessibility developers concered about Oracle's commitment
GNOME accessibility developers concered about Oracle's commitment