|
|
Subscribe / Log in / New account

Companies have a purpose, specified in their initial paperwork...

Companies have a purpose, specified in their initial paperwork...

Posted Feb 1, 2010 14:14 UTC (Mon) by tialaramex (subscriber, #21167)
In reply to: if copyright assignment is so evil, why don't you oppose FSF requiring it? by AndreE
Parent article: Canonical copyright assignment policy 'same as others' (ITWire)

Actually a company can be set up with arbitrary rules. It's unlikely that you'd manage to IPO a company with rules that made commercial success very difficult to achieve, but nothing stops a private company (and Canonical is a private company) from having such rules.

It is very common for people (even supposedly "smart" stock market people) to imagine that all for-profits are somehow interchangeable profit hunting outfits, mercenaries willing to do anything to make a buck and differentiated only in where they're starting from in that hunt. In fact nothing could be further from the truth. Nearly all companies have specific goals outside of "make a profit".

Of course the owners (in total) of the company can wind it up and start over, but that's uncommon and cannot be forced by a single greedy shareholder in a public company. It's also very easy to engineer things so that a radical change would trigger "change of control" conditions, break contracts with partners and release key employees under favourable conditions. An unpopular change in this case would be corporate "suicide".


to post comments


Copyright © 2025, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds