|
|
Subscribe / Log in / New account

if copyright assignment is so evil, why don't you oppose FSF requiring it?

if copyright assignment is so evil, why don't you oppose FSF requiring it?

Posted Feb 1, 2010 13:47 UTC (Mon) by skvidal (guest, #3094)
In reply to: if copyright assignment is so evil, why don't you oppose FSF requiring it? by AndreE
Parent article: Canonical copyright assignment policy 'same as others' (ITWire)

Canonical is a privately held company. They aren't beholding to anyone necessarily.

One of the virtues of being privately held is doing what you want/think is right BEFORE answering to shareholders.


to post comments

if copyright assignment is so evil, why don't you oppose FSF requiring it?

Posted Feb 1, 2010 15:45 UTC (Mon) by andrel (guest, #5166) [Link]

In practice private corporations are more answerable to shareholders than public companies. Canonical's shareholder runs the company as he sees fit.


Copyright © 2025, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds