GSM encryption crack made public
GSM encryption crack made public
Posted Jan 7, 2010 18:39 UTC (Thu) by drag (guest, #31333)In reply to: GSM encryption crack made public by Baylink
Parent article: GSM encryption crack made public
government.
Posted Jan 7, 2010 18:51 UTC (Thu)
by drag (guest, #31333)
[Link] (7 responses)
Posted Jan 8, 2010 4:42 UTC (Fri)
by Baylink (guest, #755)
[Link]
Got it. ;-)
Posted Jan 8, 2010 23:14 UTC (Fri)
by njs (subscriber, #40338)
[Link] (5 responses)
What? Really? Cite please?
Posted Jan 9, 2010 0:01 UTC (Sat)
by anselm (subscriber, #2796)
[Link] (4 responses)
That would be -- tadaa! -- the Federal Denture Act (18 USC 1821, enacted
in 1942 and amended in 1996 and 2002).
You may be relieved to hear that the penalty of a fine and/or one year in
the federal pen
applies not to your granddad crossing a state line with his dentures but
specifically to people who market unlicensed dentures in
interstate commerce -- where »unlicensed« means »not manufactured or
legally approved by a dentist licensed to practice in the state where
the dentures are being sent«. So, no false teeth on the cheap
over the Internet.
Some very few US states allow »denturists« to sell dentures to the
general public without the involvement of dentists, and denturists have
been campaigning to be allowed to do so in other states. Dentists aren't
too keen on the idea, insisting that denturists are not properly trained
to diagnose (let alone treat) various diseases and complications in the
mouths of their patients that would prevent dentures from being properly
fitted. Considering that, in the states where it is legal, you can become
a denturist after usually a mere two-year degree and a licensing exam,
plus possibly an internship with another denturist, they may have a point.
Posted Jan 9, 2010 2:05 UTC (Sat)
by njs (subscriber, #40338)
[Link]
One could certainly argue about the fine points of profession legislation, but alas for the original poster, I don't see how this proves that the laws in the USA are "so massively out of control a normal executive violates criminal federal [law] a minimal of several times a year just doing normal business". (I can see how this might be true for copyright law, which is a particular portion of the law that is indeed massively out of control -- though even then, *criminal* violation is not *that* trivial -- but I am not sure there are any other examples.)
Posted Apr 19, 2010 7:43 UTC (Mon)
by Denture (guest, #65465)
[Link]
Posted Jan 2, 2021 1:48 UTC (Sat)
by anselm (subscriber, #2796)
[Link] (1 responses)
People interested in dentures law may be fascinated to find out that 18 USC §1821 has been repealed in the “Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2021”, specifically Division O, Title X, Section 1002(8), as part of a general cleanup of various oddball provisions in the U.S. Code which, for example, also decriminalises unauthorised for-profit use of the Forest Service's iconic “Smokey Bear” mascot.
This means that transporting dentures across state lines to where they haven't been prescribed by an appropriately licensed practicioner is now no longer a federal crime. We can presumably expect breakthroughs in online DIY denturistry.
Posted Jan 4, 2021 0:34 UTC (Mon)
by mathstuf (subscriber, #69389)
[Link]
Also you can't trust the government either way. If your involved in legal
difficulties then what you say can easily be taken out of context and used
against you. With the laws in the country so massively out of control a
normal executive violates criminal federal a minimal of several times a
year just doing normal business.
GSM encryption crack made public
For example; Doing something, like, transporting dentures (like what old
people use in their mouths) across state
lines, is a federal offense and is prosecutable with a fine and even jail.
The chances of the government picking up on something and throwing you in
jail or a dishonest person in government using something against you is
very likely if you do end up being a target.
So no. I definitely meant to protect yourself form your own government and
from your own telco.
Not also to forget that people tend to travel and your cell phone will
automatically latch onto pretty much anything. So you are very unlikely to
actually know what telephone company your going through and if your
travelling internationally then it can be controlled by a wide verity of
different governments. If your on a business trip in Asia and your in a
country like China were the government runs the businesses and they work
together.. how much do you want to have to trust their infrastructure?
That is to say, if you don't care that your shit is unsafe then you
shouldn't care if GSM encryption sucks. If you _DO_ care that GSM
encryption sucks then you should definitely not forget that the entire
infrastructure is a huge pile of crap when it comes to security.
If your going to be paranoid then you might as well do it right.
GSM encryption crack made public
GSM encryption crack made public
Federal denture crime
Federal denture crime
Federal denture crime
Federal denture crime
Federal denture crime