KMS etc.
KMS etc.
Posted Dec 15, 2009 22:01 UTC (Tue) by jspaleta (subscriber, #50639)In reply to: KMS etc. by corbet
Parent article: The abrupt merging of Nouveau
You could have just focused on the posts in the thread that talked to the current legal problems concerning signing off on the binary blob as part of a merge. Both of the Dave Arlie references I gave above include some discussion about the sign-off issue which you could have selectively quoted from. There's something significantly important there I think in the premise that Red Hat legal review has a higher bar to meet on sign-off into the upstream kernel than what is required to include in Fedora.
And if you wanted to be overly sensational there's the short lived Alan/Linus sidebar discussion concerning what the agreed on rules concerning sign-off and merge actually are such as the following:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/925580
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/925880
-jef
Posted Dec 15, 2009 23:00 UTC (Tue)
by jwboyer (guest, #23296)
[Link]
KMS etc.