Comparison with other virtual desktops
Comparison with other virtual desktops
Posted Dec 10, 2009 23:59 UTC (Thu) by qg6te2 (guest, #52587)In reply to: Comparison with other virtual desktops by epa
Parent article: Red Hat open-sources SPICE
... review SPICE and compare it to its competitors such as ... plain X11?
If I recall correctly, SPICE is intended to be used as a component of an overall desktop virtualisation solution, which includes handling of USB devices (e.g. using a memory stick on a "dumb terminal" that is displaying a virtualised desktop is supposed to work). As such, one could compare X11 and SPICE purely on the protocol level, but not at the intended use level.
Posted Dec 11, 2009 1:02 UTC (Fri)
by rahvin (guest, #16953)
[Link] (2 responses)
It's an incredible -patented- technology, the only piece missing from the Redhat announcement is that the pledge that the patent won't be used against FOSS implementations. A key piece might I add, the FOSS doesn't do anyone any good with the patent threat still remaining.
Posted Dec 11, 2009 1:42 UTC (Fri)
by jamesh (guest, #1159)
[Link]
Posted Dec 11, 2009 6:19 UTC (Fri)
by rahulsundaram (subscriber, #21946)
[Link]
http://www.redhat.com/legal/patent_policy.html
Comparison with other virtual desktops
Comparison with other virtual desktops
Comparison with other virtual desktops
released by Red Hat.