Irrelevant argument
Irrelevant argument
Posted Oct 29, 2009 16:49 UTC (Thu) by southey (guest, #9466)In reply to: I see no problems by cate
Parent article: Community contributions and copyright assignment
The person has knowingly given Canonical ownership of the code. There is nothing in the agreement to keep the code non-free nor to keep the author's intentions. So Canonical can do what it likes with it.
