|
|
Subscribe / Log in / New account

BFS vs. mainline scheduler benchmarks and measurements

BFS vs. mainline scheduler benchmarks and measurements

Posted Sep 7, 2009 13:03 UTC (Mon) by mingo (guest, #31122)
In reply to: BFS vs. mainline scheduler benchmarks and measurements by yoshi314
Parent article: BFS vs. mainline scheduler benchmarks and measurements

Note, i fixed the jpegs - it was a silly mistake - sorry about that.

[ I did notice the image viewing suckiness on my dual-core laptop but blamed it on firefox ;-) ]

Anyway, i've fixed the jpegs and i've re-done and posted the measurements on a quad too in this lkml post, and the results are similar to the dual quad.


to post comments

BFS vs. mainline scheduler benchmarks and measurements

Posted Sep 7, 2009 16:18 UTC (Mon) by smurf (subscriber, #17840) [Link]

Note, i fixed the jpegs - it was a silly mistake - sorry about that.

Sure. However, your task now is to write at least twenty lines of "JPEGs are good for pictures. And nothing else. Really.", and remember to use PNGs next time. Thanks.


Copyright © 2025, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds