Well, this settles it for me

Posted Sep 7, 2009 11:38 UTC (Mon) by bvdm (guest, #42755)
In reply to: Well, this settles it for me by rsidd
Parent article: BFS vs. mainline scheduler benchmarks and measurements

Con made a very public re-entry and raised many questions. Ignor had every right to respond. And he did so in a calm and admirable manner.

Your comments about the image size ares just ad hominem which I will ignore.

Have you read Ignor's email carefully or at all? He is clearly making the case that, whatever BFS's advantages on lower end machines may be (which he chose not to contest), CFS is still better suited for the mainline.

No-one is arguing that CFS is perfect, but I have a grave concern that Con is *again* pissing in the drinking well with his style of doing things.

Well, this settles it for me

Posted Sep 7, 2009 22:35 UTC (Mon) by man_ls (guest, #15091) [Link]

Ignor had every right to respond. [...] Have you read Ignor's email carefully or at all?

No, it's pronounced "Aye gnor". (Sorry, couldn't resist after the second mention.)