|
|
Subscribe / Log in / New account

Illustrating the Linux sock_sendpage() NULL pointer dereference

Illustrating the Linux sock_sendpage() NULL pointer dereference

Posted Sep 3, 2009 2:16 UTC (Thu) by dlang (guest, #313)
Parent article: Illustrating the Linux sock_sendpage() NULL pointer dereference

does this vunerability depend on the SELinux vunerability?

if I have a system that doesn't use SELinux is this bug still there?


to post comments

Illustrating the Linux sock_sendpage() NULL pointer dereference

Posted Sep 5, 2009 13:23 UTC (Sat) by zhllg (guest, #26587) [Link] (1 responses)

if you have pulseaudio, you are still vulnerable.

Illustrating the Linux sock_sendpage() NULL pointer dereference

Posted Sep 5, 2009 19:17 UTC (Sat) by dlang (guest, #313) [Link]

but the pulseaudio thing is a seperate vunerability.

so what I think I am hearing you say is that if I don't use pulseaudio or SELinux on a system then I don't have to worry about this sock_sendpage() vunerability


Copyright © 2025, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds