|
|
Subscribe / Log in / New account

Ogg codecs dropped from HTML5

Ogg codecs dropped from HTML5

Posted Jul 6, 2009 21:40 UTC (Mon) by liljencrantz (guest, #28458)
Parent article: Ogg codecs dropped from HTML5

If all the non-Microsoft browser vendors decided to work together in order to create compelling new technologies that offer clear benefits over IE, I am convinced they could significantly speed up the rate at which IE:s dominance eroded. Instead, two of the smaller vendors keep insisting that the only acceptable codec is one that they know fully well the largest of the non-Microsoft vendors simply can not legally implement, no matter if they want to or not.

I see the political and technical reasons why Apple and Google prefer h.264, but their failure to see the bigger picture, and how much more they have to lose than they have to gain is disappointing.


to post comments

Ogg codecs dropped from HTML5

Posted Jul 6, 2009 22:55 UTC (Mon) by bcombee (subscriber, #40068) [Link] (3 responses)

Google is being more neutral... they are implementing Ogg support in Google Chrome.

Ogg codecs dropped from HTML5

Posted Jul 7, 2009 6:47 UTC (Tue) by rahulsundaram (subscriber, #21946) [Link] (2 responses)

... but not switching YouTube to use Ogg or atleast prefer Ogg suggesting that Ogg Theora doesn't meet their quality requirements while ignoring the fact that for a long time, they were using lower quality video doesn't seem that neutral to me.

http://people.xiph.org/~greg/video/ytcompare/comparison.html

Ogg codecs dropped from HTML5

Posted Jul 7, 2009 13:42 UTC (Tue) by jond (subscriber, #37669) [Link] (1 responses)

How long do you suppose it would take youtube to re-encode their video base? I think the amount of resource required to do that means they have to take codec decisions very seriously.

Ogg codecs dropped from HTML5

Posted Jul 7, 2009 16:16 UTC (Tue) by davide.del.vento (guest, #59196) [Link]

They didn't say that re-encode is unpractical (which I think with their huge machine number isn't). They *incorrectly* stated that Theora would take much more bandwidth than H.264, by the voice of Chris DiBona, fake open source program manager at Google. Please read the link before commenting


Copyright © 2025, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds