|
|
Subscribe / Log in / New account

"obviously duplicated" is irrelevant

"obviously duplicated" is irrelevant

Posted Jun 30, 2009 21:06 UTC (Tue) by nix (subscriber, #2304)
In reply to: "obviously duplicated" is irrelevant by ianw
Parent article: VFAT patent avoidance and patent workarounds

Have you *seen* VFAT? If an undergraduate student implemented something
that ugly he'd get a C, max.

(Of course, nobody wanted it to be so ugly. VFAT is the way it is because
of back-compatibility with a bunch of now-dead systems...)


to post comments


Copyright © 2025, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds