Okular, Debian, and copy restrictions
Okular, Debian, and copy restrictions
Posted Jun 2, 2009 4:16 UTC (Tue) by jake (editor, #205)In reply to: Okular, Debian, and copy restrictions by Trelane
Parent article: Okular, Debian, and copy restrictions
It seems a bit hard to argue that there is a *legal* basis for choosing to implement the copy bit if a way is also provided to circumvent it. Particularly one that is easily available through the UI.
jake
Posted Jun 2, 2009 4:26 UTC (Tue)
by Trelane (subscriber, #56877)
[Link]
Posted Jun 2, 2009 6:13 UTC (Tue)
by tdwebste (guest, #18154)
[Link] (1 responses)
From a practical point of view once I sign a document off I do NOT want others to modify that document without some indication.
I currently use git to sign documents off. This works well for me, but takes a bit of explaining for lawyers understand how and why the document's authenticity is verified.
Posted Jun 2, 2009 8:10 UTC (Tue)
by tzafrir (subscriber, #11501)
[Link]
A shell script that disables it through the configuration, a KDE-level sccript that works through the GUI to disable it, or whatever.
The "DRM" protection is not reliable and enforceable. If you think it is, please point to such an immutable document for the amusement of the crowd.
BTW: I can still generate a new document with your content (give or take a few minor changes) and re-sign it with my signature. The generated document will have a valid format. If that's all you check you won't get very far.
Okular, Debian, and copy restrictions
GUI copy mode selection is not scriptable, and verified document authenticity
GUI copy mode selection is not scriptable, and verified document authenticity