Firefox 3.0.9 released

Open Source *can* be a source of greater assurances about system security due to greater access for legitimate auditors but the assumption that there are many people looking isn't always valid. Plus, crap code can be produced large quantities in either side of this industry. I've seen nothing about the Mozilla Corporation or Firefox that suggests that it's anything other than a code-churning organization and a horribly written product.

"Open Source" isn't magic pixie dust that turns offal into prime cuts.