|
|
Subscribe / Log in / New account

Re: Meta-cycles: 2-3 year major cycles for free software? (Here Be Dragons)

Re: Meta-cycles: 2-3 year major cycles for free software? (Here Be Dragons)

Posted Apr 23, 2009 22:13 UTC (Thu) by malor (guest, #2973)
In reply to: Re: Meta-cycles: 2-3 year major cycles for free software? (Here Be Dragons) by nevyn
Parent article: Meta-cycles: 2-3 year major cycles for free software? (Here Be Dragons)

Well, you could actually, you know, inject some signal and add some facts to your post, instead of just being insulting.

If I'm substantively wrong, I'd be interested to know how. "RHEL = Debian Stable; Fedora = Debian Unstable" both seem to be fair comparisons to me. Do you disagree? If so, why?


to post comments


Copyright © 2025, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds