|
|
Subscribe / Log in / New account

From ext3 to ext4: An Interview with Theodore Ts'o (Linux Magazine)

From ext3 to ext4: An Interview with Theodore Ts'o (Linux Magazine)

Posted Mar 31, 2009 6:41 UTC (Tue) by nix (subscriber, #2304)
In reply to: From ext3 to ext4: An Interview with Theodore Ts'o (Linux Magazine) by bojan
Parent article: From ext3 to ext4: An Interview with Theodore Ts'o (Linux Magazine)

Personally, I've spent some time last week slobbering over Areca RAID
cards. 256Mb+ of battery-backed cache RAM. Barriers? Data loss on power
failure? That's *so* last century.

(And combine it with fs-cache and running everything else over NFS, and
you get the storage reliability of RAID and read speeds almost
local-disk-equivalent. Only writes and metadata reads are down, and I
assume that in time the latter in particular will be cacheable too.)


to post comments

Power failure was not even in the picture before your rant

Posted Mar 31, 2009 7:45 UTC (Tue) by khim (subscriber, #9252) [Link] (1 responses)

The whole discission started with software crash (nVidia drivers are very helpful here). I fail to see how these "new century" toys can help against this.

Power failure was not even in the picture before your rant

Posted Apr 3, 2009 13:55 UTC (Fri) by anton (subscriber, #25547) [Link]

A software crash is less severe than a power failure, because file systems that don't use barriers properly (e.g., ext3 by default) will see all their writes come through to the disk drive, but on a power failure some writes may not have been carried out, whereas some logically later writes may have been carried out. As a result, such a file system can become inconsistent on power failure even if it does not get inconsistent on a software crash.


Copyright © 2025, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds