Firefox 3.1 becoming Firefox 3.5
From: | Mike Shaver <mike.shaver-AT-gmail.com> | |
To: | "mozilla.dev.planning group" <dev-planning-AT-lists.mozilla.org> | |
Subject: | Firefox 3.1 becoming Firefox 3.5 | |
Date: | Thu, 5 Mar 2009 14:18:13 -0500 | |
Message-ID: | <cc092ba00903051118m4c4c41f9q6a96d4f47aca3186@mail.gmail.com> |
As was discussed at the delivery meeting yesterday, we're proposing to change the version number of Shiretoko from 3.1 to 3.5. The increase in scope represented by TraceMonkey and Private Browsing, plus the sheer volume of work that's gone into everything from video and layout to places and the plugin service make it a larger increment than we believe is reasonable to label ".1". 3.5 will help set expectations better about the amount of awesome that's packed into Shiretoko, and we expect uptake help from that as well. It's important to note that 3.5 represents a better labelling of our *current* scope, and not an indication that we intend to significantly increase this release's scope any further. Beta 3 will be the last milestone release with the 3.1 version number, and Firefox 3.5b4 will be the following one. mozilla-central's Minefield version will be changed to 3.6pre as a placeholder. For an abundance of clarity: this does not indicate that the next version will be called "Firefox 3.6" when it's shipped. The Gecko version number will remain 1.9.1 on the mozilla-1.9.1 branch, and will remain 1.9.2 on mozilla-central for the foreseeable future. Work is underway to make sure that we can get the version identifiers updated in relevant places like AMO, bugzilla, crash-stats and tinderbox with minimal disruption. Those changes will start to roll out this week. There has been a lot of great conversation over the last few weeks about how to balance product cadence (and its attendant impact on users) with web-technology delivery and support for multiple dependent products; I expect more concrete proposals to manifest here in the coming weeks, as we get Firefox 3.5 (woo!) closer to ship. Mike
Posted Mar 12, 2009 8:02 UTC (Thu)
by job (guest, #670)
[Link] (1 responses)
This is just insane. Why .5 and not .8 for even more awesome?
Posted Mar 12, 2009 8:28 UTC (Thu)
by quotemstr (subscriber, #45331)
[Link]
Seriously, Firefox 3.5 will break compatibility all over the place, especially anything that even has dreams of one day touching the Javascript core. It might as well be called Firefox 4 in my book.
Then again, you're talking to a guy who likes the versioning scheme less uses: a single monotonically increasing number.
Firefox 3.1 becoming Firefox 3.5
Firefox 3.1 becoming Firefox 3.5