The new GCC runtime library exemption
The new GCC runtime library exemption
Posted Jan 29, 2009 17:52 UTC (Thu) by JoeBuck (subscriber, #2330)In reply to: The new GCC runtime library exemption by anton
Parent article: The new GCC runtime library exemption
Not even that: those using proprietary plugins just need runtime libraries that don't have the new language; they could use the code from old GCC releases, for example. But they'd then have to fork all the language support libraries, which for C++ at least would be a huge task going forward (especially as the C++ word transitions to c++0x).
Posted Jan 30, 2009 2:35 UTC (Fri)
by xoddam (guest, #2322)
[Link] (5 responses)
Posted Jan 30, 2009 2:50 UTC (Fri)
by dlang (guest, #313)
[Link] (4 responses)
Posted Jan 30, 2009 4:36 UTC (Fri)
by bronson (subscriber, #4806)
[Link] (3 responses)
But if it comes out in 2011, I guess they'd have to call it C++0xi.
Posted Jan 30, 2009 5:53 UTC (Fri)
by pflugstad (subscriber, #224)
[Link] (2 responses)
Pete
PS: can't believe I'm the only one that saw that... or maybe
Posted Jan 30, 2009 12:36 UTC (Fri)
by xoddam (guest, #2322)
[Link]
Posted Jan 30, 2009 15:48 UTC (Fri)
by anton (subscriber, #25547)
[Link]
C++0x -- flogging a dead cat?
C++0x -- flogging a dead cat?
C++0x -- flogging a dead cat?
C++0x -- flogging a dead cat?
just the first
C++0x -- flogging a dead cat?
It was probably in 1989 when I read a comment that Fortran 8x would
have to use hex digits if it needed any longer. However, the released
version was not called Fortran 8A, but Fortran 90.
C++0x -- flogging a dead cat?