Huh?
Huh?
Posted Jan 9, 2009 5:27 UTC (Fri) by BrucePerens (guest, #2510)Parent article: EMTEC releases the Gdium netbook computer
I must be missing something. What is compelling about this offering?
Posted Jan 9, 2009 7:06 UTC (Fri)
by tajyrink (subscriber, #2750)
[Link] (1 responses)
Interesting that they don't promise more battery usage time, since eg. the video card is straight from the mobile/embedded world, I think, with no 3D acceleration.
Posted Jan 9, 2009 10:04 UTC (Fri)
by eru (subscriber, #2753)
[Link]
It does not have one. It is a quite pure RISC. One project I'm involved
with uses a 64-bit MIPS architecture processor in an embedded system. The
Gdium notebook might actually be a usable stand-in for the expensive
real boards for some testing (faster weeding-out of x86-isms
that sometimes creep in).
Posted Jan 9, 2009 10:51 UTC (Fri)
by Zack (guest, #37335)
[Link] (2 responses)
Their "one laptop per hacker" program is unusual.
Also the fact that it uses a mips processor. This means that for now it's firmly wedded to the GNU/Linux operating system, instead of GNU/Linux being an also-ran shipped only with the intention of being replaced with a infringing copy of a proprietary operating system at a later date.
I'm not sure if it is compelling enough to be mentioned seperately on LWN, especially since one of their competitors ships a mips based netbook which includes a free software bios and a somewhat similar attitude regarding free software. But it's great if a non-x86 architecture would manage to carve out a persistent market space in general computing devices, which would automatically piggyback free software operating systems into lead position in that space.
Posted Jan 9, 2009 16:57 UTC (Fri)
by amimjf (guest, #506)
[Link] (1 responses)
Not automatically i am afraid as Windows CE/Mobile runs on MIPS.
It would make the applications developers work harder though.
- Matthew
Posted Jan 10, 2009 20:19 UTC (Sat)
by dmaxwell (guest, #14010)
[Link]
Huh?
MIPS sounds interesting, if it's not being used in some x86 compatibility mode.
Huh?
Huh?
Huh?
But it's great if a non-x86 architecture would manage to carve out a persistent market space in general computing devices, which would automatically piggyback free software operating systems into lead position in that space.
--
Huh?