Free Documentation License 1.3
Free Documentation License 1.3
Posted Nov 4, 2008 8:51 UTC (Tue) by BrucePerens (guest, #2510)In reply to: Free Documentation License 1.3 by TRS-80
Parent article: Free Documentation License 1.3
Wikipedia hasn't had any invariant sections for a long time. I don't know if it ever did.
Posted Nov 4, 2008 13:30 UTC (Tue)
by tajyrink (subscriber, #2750)
[Link]
Basically Wikipedia, and also myself somewhere, use the "GFDL with no invariant sections or front/back cover texts" license, which is quite ok as a license. The "DRM" text is indeed a bit bad, though, but it could be worse.
Free Documentation License 1.3
I think the only thing was that it didn't earlier explicitly state that no invariant sections shall be used.