Journal shmournal
Journal shmournal
Posted Oct 30, 2008 7:01 UTC (Thu) by ebirdie (guest, #512)In reply to: Journal shmournal by tetromino
Parent article: Directions for GNOME 3.0
I just wonder, if the above haven't been yet applied to file dialogs/browsers somewhere. I think there isn't any new idea per se in the above description, just that is applied to file dialogs and file browsers.
Well, I hope I didn't resemble Windows file dialog in the above. Anyway the point is to apply those great input and categorizing methods already successfully implemented in shells and web browser address bars.
Posted Oct 30, 2008 9:34 UTC (Thu)
by lab (guest, #51153)
[Link] (2 responses)
Maybe someone has already made this, and I'd love to get some pointers.
Posted Oct 30, 2008 11:07 UTC (Thu)
by appie (guest, #34002)
[Link] (1 responses)
The whole directory/file mantra is an outdated concept, it works yes, but tags can offer much more flexibility. And after all, using tags isn't that much different from creating a directory tree, in a sense one is already supplying meta data for the files stored in it: work related -> tenders -> customerName for instance.
One has to get used to the idea of describing the data we're working on and retrieving them by describing them ('tenders oct 2008' or 'tenders customerName'.)
And it wouldn't be static, if I can only think of a limited set of tags at first and sometime later can think of more and better tags, I can always add them at that time.
From using tags one can go to creating relations between objects stored and their tags.
Most modern file systems already incorporate meta data functionality. What's needed is a way to efficiently index and search the tags.
Posted Oct 31, 2008 15:02 UTC (Fri)
by mjthayer (guest, #39183)
[Link]
Posted Oct 30, 2008 12:05 UTC (Thu)
by tnoo (subscriber, #20427)
[Link]
Posted Nov 1, 2008 12:30 UTC (Sat)
by bfields (subscriber, #19510)
[Link]
Dig around a bit and I think you'll find a ton of projects, academic papers, etc., on tagging and metadata.
One problem, I believe, is: most of us have enough trouble just developing a consistent system for directory and file names. So we certainly aren't going to do a good job of assigning and managing a bunch of additional metadata. Except where it's standardized and automatically collected (digital photo timestamps, album info on mp3's...), it's probably a loss.
Tagging filesystems
Tagging filesystems
Some tags can be auto generated like the date/time created, last consulted, filetype (text document, picture, ...). When for instance camera's get equipped with GPS by default, an automatic tag with the location can be added to every picture we store in the fs.
Plus, my view on the data probably doesn't reflect someone else's view on it. Tags allow us to have one user describe data with one set of tags and another user describe it with another set of tags. Finally, at least digitally, no arguments on the illogical place where stuff was put by someone else, e.g. your SO :)
Plus of course the user interfaces to them.
Tagging filesystems
Journal shmournal
Journal shmournal