Bug reports of DFSG violations are tagged "lenny-ignore"
[Posted October 28, 2008 by corbet]
From: |
| Ben Finney <ben+debian-AT-benfinney.id.au> |
To: |
| debian-devel-AT-lists.debian.org |
Subject: |
| Bug reports of DFSG violations are tagged =?utf-8?Q?=E2=80=98lenn?=
=?utf-8?Q?y-ignore=E2=80=99=3F?= |
Date: |
| Mon, 20 Oct 2008 16:12:25 +1100 |
Message-ID: |
| <87prlv7sue.fsf@benfinney.id.au> |
Archive‑link: | |
Article |
Howdy all,
Have I missed some announcement that DFSG violations don't matter for
the release of ?lenny?
I ask because a whole lot of bug reports of DFSG violations have been
tagged ?lenny-ignore?without explanation:
<URL:http://bugs.debian.org/391935>
<URL:http://bugs.debian.org/498631>
<URL:http://bugs.debian.org/494308>
<URL:http://bugs.debian.org/494010>
<URL:http://bugs.debian.org/494009>
<URL:http://bugs.debian.org/494007>
and probably others I've missed.
Should these tags be removed? I would think at least a meaningful
justification in the bug report is required if DFSG violations are to
be explicitly ignored, but perhaps I'm wrong.
--
\ ?Oh, I realize it's a penny here and a penny there, but look at |
`\ me: I've worked myself up from nothing to a state of extreme |
_o__) poverty.? ?Groucho Marx |
Ben Finney
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org