Who is "Lenny" and why should I do anything for him?
Who is "Lenny" and why should I do anything for him?
Posted Oct 7, 2008 2:41 UTC (Tue) by k8to (guest, #15413)In reply to: Who is "Lenny" and why should I do anything for him? by buchanmilne
Parent article: What you can do for "Lenny"
The choice of referring to debian projects solely by unsortable codenames when it is generally known the release order is hiding information and stupid.
The names used to refer to successive releases of the SAME THING should be sortable, so that users can determine the order. When referring to an imminent release, one shuld use turns of phrase such as:
"Lenny", the upcoming release of Debian Stable, currently in release process, optimistically expected to complete this year.
Of course this is insufficient, since the version number has undoubtedly been selected by now and should also be invoked, regardless of whatever phantom menaces you can conjure about CD-Rom sales. And the codename, as above needs to be sortable.
Posted Oct 7, 2008 16:11 UTC (Tue)
by allesfresser (guest, #216)
[Link] (2 responses)
Posted Oct 7, 2008 18:05 UTC (Tue)
by hppnq (guest, #14462)
[Link]
But what is this dodgy "Debian" people keep talking about?!
Posted Oct 7, 2008 18:33 UTC (Tue)
by alfille (subscriber, #1631)
[Link]
This is just like reviewing program code. Everything can be unobfuscated with enough effort, but clarity has many advantages.
We read LWN for a higher level view of the linux development scene. I assume that the editor was so immersed in Debian that he automatically knew what Lenny meant. I know that I didn't.
While the vehemence of the original complaint is misplaced, the point is valid.
Who is "Lenny" and why should I do anything for him?
Some people like to spend time arguing about, say, conventions, instead of, say, simply reading the first line of the article they are commenting on. Happens all the time.
Who is "Lenny" and why should I do anything for him?
Who is "Lenny" and why should I do anything for him?