smoke screen?
smoke screen?
Posted Oct 1, 2008 19:21 UTC (Wed) by apokryphos (guest, #42130)In reply to: smoke screen? by s0f4r
Parent article: Ubuntu debuts its Upstream Report
Greg KH's speech was quite simply that Ubuntu are not the upstream innovators. Critics who complained that he didn't consider the GNOME projects still do not change this fact, and critics who suggest that Canonical is a smaller company are side-stepping the issue. Launchpad is part of the problem, but one of the main problems IMO is one of erroneous attribution. For example I have seen many Ubuntu users suggesting to others that they created Compiz -- a project that actually cost Novell thousands of dollars.
Companies like Red Hat and SUSE should be getting tremendous credit for consistently paying free software developers to work on the Linux server/desktop day-in-day-out, and this so frequently does not happen.
Posted Oct 1, 2008 20:13 UTC (Wed)
by bfields (subscriber, #19510)
[Link] (3 responses)
Might want to count those zero's again....
Posted Oct 1, 2008 21:12 UTC (Wed)
by louie (guest, #3285)
[Link] (2 responses)
Posted Oct 1, 2008 21:14 UTC (Wed)
by jspaleta (subscriber, #50639)
[Link]
-jef
Posted Oct 2, 2008 19:49 UTC (Thu)
by louie (guest, #3285)
[Link]
Posted Oct 2, 2008 9:17 UTC (Thu)
by kripkenstein (guest, #43281)
[Link]
What do a few misinformed users have to do with Canonical or Ubuntu? I've never seen either claim they created Compiz.
smoke screen?
a project that actually cost Novell thousands of dollars.
how many zeroes
how many zeroes
how many zeroes
smoke screen?