|
|
Subscribe / Log in / New account

distribution-specific agreements considered harmful

distribution-specific agreements considered harmful

Posted Sep 18, 2008 21:04 UTC (Thu) by jspaleta (subscriber, #50639)
In reply to: distribution-specific agreements considered harmful by joey
Parent article: Firefox 3 EULA raises a ruckus

"Are there other distributions that have a similar policy and a similar integrety in sticking with it? I was suprised to find that Gentoo's social contract, despite being originally based on the DFSG, leaves this point out."

Hmm, I wasn't personally aware of this particular clause. I'll be ruminating on it. As far as I know, Fedora doesn't have any special Fedora only licensing terms with anybody.. including Mozilla. I'll probably start a discussion about enshrining this clause or something akin to it in Fedora's policies.

-jef


to post comments


Copyright © 2025, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds