Evolution: Taking forward...
From: | "Srinivasa Ragavan" <sragavan-AT-novell.com> | |
To: | <desktop-devel-list-AT-gnome.org>,<evolution-hackers-AT-gnome.org> | |
Subject: | Evolution: Taking forward... | |
Date: | Fri, 11 Jul 2008 04:21:56 -0600 | |
Message-ID: | <4876FC0402000090000269EC@sinclair.provo.novell.com> |
Hello guys, We have had a set of problems that we are carrying around for some time like : * Copyright assignments, which is not the best way looking for the future of Evolution. It sucks and sort of limits contributions to Evolution and we wanted to drop it. * The current licensing incompatibility issues of Evolution with Samba4/libmapi (GPLv3). Evolution needs to link with libmapi/samba4 for the new mapi based connector being developed for Exchange 2007. So here is the plan : * Drop Evolution copyright assignments and make it really easy to contribute to Evolution * Move Evolution licensing to "LGPL v2 and LGPL v3" to let us re-use the code more easily around the platform. This also moves us closer to Thunderbird's MPL/LGPL model. We think this is good for Evolution and (of course) we continue to invest in Evolution. We are also working to ensure we have the rights to re-license all of the code. We will do the licensing/header changes as we audit the code ownership situation. It would be really helpful if you can post a public/explicit mail with permissions to do it, or code pointers - if you think you wrote a piece of Evolution code & object. We are really excited about this and we feel this would really help Evolution a lot. We need your support now for making this change and to take Evolution to great heights. ?Thanks for your contributions and support. -Srini. _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Posted Jul 28, 2008 3:14 UTC (Mon)
by vonbrand (subscriber, #4458)
[Link]
Problem with such a relicensing plan is precisely those people who don't show up to vote "aye" or "nay"... luckily here they do have the copyright assignments on file, but going that way constrains the project's development.
Just another reason why IMVHO GPLv3 is a mistake.
Evolution: Taking forward...