Rawhide users: brace for a new RPM
Rawhide users: brace for a new RPM
Posted Jul 9, 2008 16:51 UTC (Wed) by aleXXX (subscriber, #2742)Parent article: Rawhide users: brace for a new RPM
Does it support spaces in the paths now ? Alex
Posted Jul 9, 2008 18:02 UTC (Wed)
by tarvin (guest, #4412)
[Link] (3 responses)
Posted Jul 9, 2008 19:57 UTC (Wed)
by spot (guest, #15640)
[Link]
Posted Jul 10, 2008 10:22 UTC (Thu)
by james (subscriber, #1325)
[Link] (1 responses)
Posted Jul 10, 2008 17:10 UTC (Thu)
by tarvin (guest, #4412)
[Link]
Dual-arch handling
The current Red Hat/Fedora RPM wreaks havoc on your x86_64 system if you clean out the
i[356]86 packages:
Let package X be a package which exists in both an x86_64 and i386 version, and both are
installed during system installation. Let X contain both arch-dependent and arch-independent
files. An arch independent file could be /usr/share/locale/xx/LC_MESSAGES/foo.mo. If you
remove X.i386, X.x86_64 will suddenly be broken, because RPM removed
/usr/share/locale/xx/LC_MESSAGES/foo.mo.
I hope the new RPM handles this in the obvious way: When removing a package, don't remove a
file if it's also part of another, not-removed package.
Dual-arch handling
Is this filed as a bug anywhere?
Dual-arch handling
Which versions are you seeing this with?
This bug certainly *used* to exist, but it got fixed a couple of Fedora releases ago.
Dual-arch handling
Sorry - it seems you are right: recent Fedoras aren't affected. But RHEL 5.2 was last time I
checked (a week ago).