Fedora Board Recap 2008-JUN-10
[Posted June 18, 2008 by ris]
From: |
| John Poelstra <poelstra-AT-redhat.com> |
To: |
| fedora-advisory-board-AT-redhat.com |
Subject: |
| Fedora Board Recap 2008-JUN-10 |
Date: |
| Tue, 17 Jun 2008 11:22:36 -0400 |
Message-ID: |
| <4857D6BC.9050805@redhat.com> |
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Board/Meetings/2008-06-10
== Roll Call ==
* Attendees: Steve Dickson, Chris Aillon, Matt Domsch, Bill Nottingham,
John Poelstra, Paul Frields, Seth Vidal, Karsten Wade, Jeff Spaleta
* Regrets: Dennis Gilmore
== Followup to Previous Business ==
=== Fedora Organizational Structure (2008-06-03) ===
* Joint meeting with Board and FESCo held on 2008-06-09
** http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Board/Meetings/2008-06-09
** Proposed roles: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Pfrields/Drafts/Roles
* The board has not change its stance that FESCo owns the feature process
* Lengthy discussion about the path forward
== Future Business (discuss at a future meeting) ==
=== Codeina (2008-05-13) ===
* Need to restart discussion on fedora-advisory-board@redhat.com to get
plans in place at the start of F10
* Chris Aillon to make contact with Bastien Nocera to find out what
current plans are
=== Secondary Architectures ===
* ia64 is close to coming online and two issues need to be resolved to
move forward:
# Packages are signed with a fedora-ia64 specific key and the repository
keys are hard coded in the fedora-release package as the main Fedora and
Fedora beta keys.
# The download baseurl (outside of the mirror lists, which are correctly
handled) will be at secondary.fedoraproject.org (or whatever).
Therefore they can not spin a release from Fedora packages.
* Is this a board issue to resolve or simply an information update to
the board to keep them updated?