Why companies don't support Debian (LinuxWatch)
Why companies don't support Debian (LinuxWatch)
Posted Feb 1, 2008 8:43 UTC (Fri) by branden (guest, #7029)Parent article: Why companies don't support Debian (LinuxWatch)
This article is really poorly informed, and I'm surprised at that as I don't recall Mr. Vaughn-Nichols being quite so hasty to publish before checking facts when I was Debian Project Leader. Companies can and do support Debian, not only through donations of hardware, but conspicuously by supporting DebConf. For years it has been the practice that a significant amount of DebConf's budget has gone sponsoring travel expenses to our annual conference, in direct contradiction to Mr. Vaughn-Nichols's assertion. The DebConf organizing team has for the last several years published a detailed report, which includes budgetary matters. We also make no secret of our sponsorships; journalists who attend DebConf would be hard pressed not to notice the ubiquitous T-shirts which list the year's numerous sponsors on the back. (While many developers wear their hair long enough to obscure such a listing, this should not present an insuperable obstacle to the assiduous fact-gatherer. At DebConf 5 in 2005, for example, the sponsors were also listed in the official program of the conference.) Not only is it not the case that "there's no one to write a check to", but big firms like Sun, Google, and HP have long known that, in the United States, Software in the Public Interest, Inc. (SPI), is the 501(c)3 corporation of first resort if you want to Debian out. Checks from Google for Debian, PostgreSQL, and other Summer of Code projects come directly to SPI, and the funds held in trust for the member projects. Michael Schultheiss, a friend and fellow Progeny alum, is the current SPI Treasurer (as was I, at one time), and could no doubt clarify many of these matters. As could Sam Hocevar, Anthony Towns, or other folks named in the article. That the piece calls itself out as an "opinion" should not relieve the author of all responsibility to check his or her facts. That big name op-ed writers like David Brooks and Jonah Goldberg (just to name two examples) fail to hold themselves to such a standard does not make them worthy of emulation--it makes them figures to be transcended.
