Realtime is also needed for multimedia
Realtime is also needed for multimedia
Posted Dec 8, 2007 4:16 UTC (Sat) by ssavitzky (subscriber, #2855)In reply to: Realtime is also needed for multimedia by niv
Parent article: Enterprise realtime and cooperative development
I don't normally tweak priorities, but I don't usually have anything running when I'm recording except Audacity, an xterm, and X. I've found that you want to use a separate video card rather than one that shares main memory, and you want to turn off the DRI (Direct Rendering Interface) in the X server config file. Recording onto an NFS-mounted filesystem is dicey.
Posted Dec 11, 2007 1:55 UTC (Tue)
by RobertBrockway (guest, #48927)
[Link] (1 responses)
Posted Dec 11, 2007 14:31 UTC (Tue)
by ssavitzky (subscriber, #2855)
[Link]
I actually recorded about 2/3 of my CD that way -- it worked, but there was a noticable lag that made it less responsive for editing and overdubbing. My current recording box is a dual-core CPU, which gives me the best of both worlds.
Realtime is also needed for multimedia
Perhaps you don't want to run X on the box at all. X is network transparent so you can
display Audacity to another box on the network. Yes this means involving another box (or a
thin client) but it _might_ give better performance.
Realtime is also needed for multimedia