SMACK meets the One True Security Module
SMACK meets the One True Security Module
Posted Oct 3, 2007 3:23 UTC (Wed) by drag (guest, #31333)In reply to: SMACK meets the One True Security Module by drag
Parent article: SMACK meets the One True Security Module
OMG, I can't beleive I posted the above to teh wrong article.WTF was I thinking.
:(
Posted Oct 4, 2007 0:09 UTC (Thu)
by jamesm (guest, #2273)
[Link] (4 responses)
Posted Oct 5, 2007 9:18 UTC (Fri)
by pr1268 (guest, #24648)
[Link] (3 responses)
Agreed! Drag's comment about his "IDE" of vim and python vs. Eclipse did indeed bear some resemblance to the discussion about SELinux vs. AppArmour. What a pleasantly surreal experience! Thanks to Drag's misplaced comment, I just had a bright idea: Eclipse IDE for SELinux!! Use all the features you've come to expect with using Eclipse to develop Java, C, or C++... and now you can build your own security framework! Testing your framework is simply a few mouse clicks away via the "build/debug" menu. </end silliness> ;-)
Posted Oct 5, 2007 14:07 UTC (Fri)
by nix (subscriber, #2304)
[Link] (1 responses)
Posted Dec 11, 2008 18:22 UTC (Thu)
by SEJeff (guest, #51588)
[Link]
Oddly enough, it still makes sense here :-)
SMACK meets the One True Security Module
Thanks to Drag replying to wrong article, I just had a bright idea
Obviously the *right* approach is an Emacs specialized entirely for writing SELinux configurations. There's even an XEmacs fork with the right name: SXEmacs. Just reuse the name, write a new selinux mode, rip out all that boring stuff nobody uses like text-mode, cc-mode, vm and gnus, and you're home free! :)Thanks to Drag replying to wrong article, I just had a bright idea
Thanks to Drag replying to wrong article, I just had a bright idea