A complaint about the look at the SCO complaint
A complaint about the look at the SCO complaint
Posted Mar 7, 2003 19:35 UTC (Fri) by torsten (guest, #4137)In reply to: A complaint about the look at the SCO complaint by jonth
Parent article: A look at the SCO complaint
If you don't find value in what you have paid for, don't pay, or reduce your subscription level. Personally, I find this article of tremendous value. That the information may benefit a thousand other people, only multiplies my $10 monthly investment by a factor of 1000. I'd say that is a better return on investment than most.
Try not to be so self-centered.
Torsten
Posted Mar 8, 2003 14:49 UTC (Sat)
by jonth (guest, #4008)
[Link] (1 responses)
I just feel that LWN short-changed itself. This was a really interesting article, just the sort of high quality comment I have come to expect from the LWN front page. However, it wasn't earth-shatteringly important that everybody read it right now, and as such, should have been restricted to those who pay for LWN. If they had, then perhaps those people who don't pay would have read it in a week's time and thought, "hey, that would be worth the money" and subscribed to LWN.
cheers,
Jonth
Posted Mar 10, 2003 22:55 UTC (Mon)
by Odinson (guest, #1402)
[Link]
The world does need this kind of anaylsis to not dismiss Linux at a cheap IP rip off scheme, yesterday. There is already malcontent among the Linux .com GPL ignorant/unfortunate.
Sorry, I am not being self centred. Did I say I was unhappy about paying for the content? No. I said that I was unhappy that it was sent out to all the people who don't support LWN.
A complaint about the look at the SCO complaint
You have been looking at the unfounded Linux bashing on the Microsoft stock boards then. A complaint about the look at the SCO complaint