Free ATI drivers for Christmas? (Linux.com)
Free ATI drivers for Christmas? (Linux.com)
Posted Sep 1, 2007 17:15 UTC (Sat) by pizza (subscriber, #46)In reply to: Free ATI drivers for Christmas? (Linux.com) by nim-nim
Parent article: Free ATI drivers for Christmas? (Linux.com)
>>I know a lot of "enterprise uses" who use ATI's and NVidia's binary drivers on desktop
>Only true while there's no performing alternative, and Intel is busy ramping up it's offerings
Until Intel starts selling standalone graphics chips (ie non-shared memory) their offerings will never be considered by server manufacturers, simply because of the performance hit due to contention on the memory bus.
Desktop is another matter; but on that front Intel is already is the largest vendor of graphics chipsets, marketshare-wise.
Posted Sep 1, 2007 17:32 UTC (Sat)
by nim-nim (subscriber, #34454)
[Link] (2 responses)
yes, sure, that's why the speed daemon RageXL is is so popular on servers
Posted Sep 3, 2007 7:23 UTC (Mon)
by ncm (guest, #165)
[Link] (1 responses)
Posted Sep 3, 2007 7:27 UTC (Mon)
by nim-nim (subscriber, #34454)
[Link]
> Until Intel starts selling standalone graphics chips (ie non-sharedFree ATI drivers for Christmas? (Linux.com)
> memory) their offerings will never be considered by server manufacturers,
The point isn't how fast the graphics chip is; servers won't be doing graphics operations. What counts is whether its load on the memory bus slows down CPU operations. Just refreshing the display does that. A properly configured server would have the display driver stop refreshing the display after a period of mouse/keyboard inactivity. Does anybody do that?Free ATI drivers for Christmas? (Linux.com)
The intel driver has all sort of low-power tricks because it also targets laptop usersFree ATI drivers for Christmas? (Linux.com)