|
|
Subscribe / Log in / New account

Microsoft's position isn't anti-open-source, it's against their competitors (esp. GPL)

Microsoft's position isn't anti-open-source, it's against their competitors (esp. GPL)

Posted Aug 14, 2007 2:23 UTC (Tue) by josh (subscriber, #17465)
In reply to: Microsoft's position isn't anti-open-source, it's against their competitors (esp. GPL) by brouhaha
Parent article: Two Microsoft licenses submitted for OSI approval

Those terms do not mean what you think they mean.

Both copyleft licenses (such as the GPL) and non-copyleft licenses (such as the BSD licenses) qualify as both Open Source and Free Software.


to post comments


Copyright © 2025, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds